George Clooney's involvement in the Hulu miniseries based on Joseph Heller's classic novel "signals the star’s ambition, and his pragmatism," says Daniel D'Addario. "The archetypal movie star executive produced the series, appears in it, and directed two episodes, and he has come to TV for a reason: It’s a way to surmount a tricky piece of the American literary canon, but to do so with the benefit of six hours and streaming-service money. If only TV could make Catch-22 perhaps only TV would be foolhardy enough to try. The new series works better than it should. It elides some of the worst of the novel’s degradation of women, streamlines as best it can the most verbose of the vignettes and builds out Yossarian — played by Christopher Abbott in a performance that announces the leading-man arrival of a long-simmering talent — into a character whose angst we feel. Yet the series, in thrall to and in the shadow of one of the most sharply written novels of its era, never finds a way to live on its own. What works, here, works well," including Abbott's performance. D'Addario adds: "If Catch-22 is unfilmable, it’s because those who are in a position to remake it are well-established enough not to understand the spirit of unpleasant, desperate mania that propels the novel relentlessly deeper into violence. Hulu’s Catch-22 is elegantly, carefully made. This is, perhaps, its greatest departure from Heller’s novel, and the reason why it feels quite so at war with itself."
ALSO:
TOPICS: Catch-22, Hulu, Christopher Abbott, George Clooney, Joseph Heller