"Now that they’re over, let’s be honest about political conventions," says Nicholas Goldberg. "They’re theater, they’re propaganda, they’re pep rallies. Nothing meaningful happens at them. First established in the 1830s, they once served a purpose — to select a party nominee, often in a smoke-filled back room, but sometimes on the convention floor — but that hasn’t been true for half a century. At best, they offer the parties a chance to excite their voters, lay out some themes of the campaign, hammer their enemies and introduce an often unknown vice presidential nominee. Doing away with these pointless quadrennial exercises would be a fine idea. But don’t kid yourselves: Abolishing the conventions wouldn’t fix a deeper problem, which is that American presidential campaigns are too often deceptive, manipulative and misleading....But is this any way for a grown-up nation to pick its leader? With TV spectacles closely modeled on awards shows like the Oscars?"
ALSO:
TOPICS: 2020 Presidential Election, Fox News Channel, MSNBC, Cable News, Ratings, Trump Presidency