Netflix's four-part true-crime docuseries "is a muddled attempt to revisit the story" of Elisa Lam's 2013 disappearance and death, says Alessa Dominguez. "Presenting itself as a study of the cultural appetite for crime, it revisits the hotel’s infamous history and rehashes the online conspiracy theories around Lam’s disappearance. But the story is an odd fit for a commentary on online sleuths because the case was neither solved by sleuths nor really disrupted by them. And the series’ relitigation of the mystery’s unanswered questions ultimately makes it an awkward attempt to exploit the hunger for crime mysteries, while simultaneously attempting to comment on that appetite." Dominguez adds: "There are certainly interesting ethical quandaries involved in the way true crime cases grab our interest, and how crime rumor-mongering plays into existing cultural prejudices, around, say, violence and people who are unhoused. Netflix’s own Unsolved Mysteries reboot did a good job of unpacking such questions throughout the multiple cases it covered. But the Lam case — as a single story — doesn’t really lend itself to that kind of analysis, at least not as presented here. The third episode of the series is titled 'Down the Rabbit Hole.' It could have been the subtitle for the entire series — and not in a good way."
ALSO:
TOPICS: Crime Scene: The Vanishing at the Cecil Hotel, Netflix, Elisa Lam , Joe Berlinger, Documentaries